Stock futures tumbled as Democrats swept Congress, then roared back before sunrise, with the Dow (^DJI) on track for its best day since April 8. History says the bounce is easy and the next few weeks are harder.
Election night went the way polls and prediction markets said it would. Democrats won control of both the House and the Senate, and futures slid as the results rolled in. Tech took the worst of it after a Democrat won the Texas governor’s race on a promise to halt new data center construction.
Then the buyers showed up, with small caps leading the way.
Don’t get too attached. Big reversals feel decisive in the moment, but they haven’t said much about what comes next. Since 1997, when S&P 500 (^GSPC) futures fell at least 1% during a session and then closed up 1% or more, the following week was about as likely to rise as any other week, according to Yahoo Finance calculations. After the biggest reversals, where futures erased a drop of 2% or more, they fell the next day nearly two out of three times.
Stocks have seen this movie before. On election night in 2016, S&P 500 futures plunged 5% and hit their limit down, then closed higher the next day. TKer editor and founder Sam Ro drew the same comparison Wednesday and warned against rushing to conclusions based on a couple of hours of trading.
The less cheerful precedent is 2018, the last time President Trump lost the House. Stocks rallied about 2% the day after that midterm, then fell about 6% over the next month on the way to a Christmas Eve low.
Small caps also deserve a reality check. The Russell 2000 (^RUT) beat the S&P 500 the day after the vote in only 5 of the past 11 midterms. The season that has favored small caps doesn’t start until mid-December.
The calendar already flashed a warning
Stocks went into Election Day in a hole. The eight sessions around a midterm vote, five before and three after, have been one of the S&P 500’s strongest stretches of the year, with gains in 18 of 19 midterms since 1950.
This year’s window opened at the Oct. 27 close, and the index was down 2% through Tuesday. That’s already a steeper loss than any full window since at least 1950, including 1994’s 1.3% drop, the only previous loser. To avoid becoming the second losing window in that stretch, the S&P 500 needs to climb about 2% from Tuesday’s close by Friday’s close.
When a pattern that reliable breaks down, it’s worth asking why. The only time the window lost money, in 1994, the Federal Reserve was raising rates. In 2018, another hiking year, the S&P 500 slid about 13% from the end of October to Christmas Eve.
Interest rates are back in the conversation
Two Fed officials dissented in favor of a hike at the Oct. 28 meeting. Central banks around the world have raised rates 42 times in six months, according to Bank of America’s Michael Hartnett, who said markets are “risk-off until global rate hike ends.” And a model from Apollo’s Torsten Sløk has the Fed’s benchmark rate near 6.75% by the end of 2027. (Disclosure: Yahoo is a portfolio company of funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Global Management.)
Chip stocks are feeling it most. The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has closed below its 200-day moving average, a widely watched gauge of the longer-term trend, for three straight sessions and is hovering near its July low. A similar fund, the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), closed below the $520 line Hartnett flagged on both Monday and Tuesday, and it was lower to slightly positive Wednesday even as the broader market surged higher.
History still leans bullish — eventually
The longer record hasn’t cracked. From the end of October in a midterm year to the following June, the S&P 500 has risen in all 19 cycles since 1950, with a median gain of about 15%. Even 1994 and 2018 finished that stretch higher.
The trouble came first, and the patient got paid later.
“I’m just cautioning against getting too excited about what’s historically been a bullish short-term period for stocks,” TKer’s Ro wrote Sunday.
Internal AI tools helped analyze interview transcripts, research, and draft this post. Humans reviewed, edited, and fact-checked this post before publication.
Follow Jared Blikre on X @SPYJared or email him at jaredblikre@yahooinc.com.





