What is it and can Trump end it? : NPR

President Donald Trump pictured signing executive orders at the White House on Monday.

President Trump signed executive orders at the White House on Monday, one of which moves to revoke birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to parents with unlawful or temporary status.

Jim Watson/Pool/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Jim Watson/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

President Donald Trump is trying to end birthright citizenship, the legal principle enshrined in the Constitution that automatically makes anyone born within the U.S. or its territories a citizen.

It’s a move that Trump first proposed during his first term and one that most legal experts agree he cannot make unilaterally.

Indeed, within days of signing his executive order on Monday, Trump’s administration was hit with at least four separate lawsuits from coalitions opposed to it, including nearly two dozen state attorneys general, a group of pregnant mothers, and immigrants’ rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

“Birthright citizenship is guaranteed in our Constitution and is absolutely central to what America stands for,” said lead attorney Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. “Denying citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil is illegal, profoundly cruel, and contrary to our values as a country.”

Asked about legal challenges to the birthright citizenship order — which were widely expected — Trump acknowledged as he signed it that it could be challenged but said, “We think we have good grounds” to move ahead. 

“We’re the only country in the world that does this” with birthright citizenship, he said.

That’s not true: Dozens of countries, including Canada, Mexico and many South American nations, offer birthright citizenship.

Here’s what to know about the principle, and what it would mean for the U.S. to end it — or at least try.

What does the Constitution say? 

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution says that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The amendment, which was ratified in 1868, sought to extend citizenship to formerly enslaved people after the Civil War.

“When birthright citizenship came about in the 14th Amendment, there weren’t unauthorized immigrants in the United States like there are today,” Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute, told NPR in December.

But it’s been applied to immigration for well over a century, dating back to the landmark 1898 Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

How has the clause been interpreted? 

“For over a century, since a young Chinese American cook from San Francisco named Wong Kim Ark won his case at the Supreme Court, birthright citizenship for all — including babies born to immigrants — has been a cornerstone of U.S. democracy,” said Aarti Kohli, executive director of the Asian Law Caucus.

Wong, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese parents, was barred from entering the U.S. — under the Chinese Exclusion Act — while returning from an overseas trip in 1890.

In a 6-2 decision, the court ruled that because Wong was born in the U.S. and his parents were not “employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China,” the 14th Amendment makes him a U.S. citizen.

A black and white portrait of Wong Kim Ark.

A 1904 portrait of Wong Kim Ark, who the Supreme Court ruled was a U.S. citizen in a landmark birthright citizenship case.

National Archives/Interim Archives/Getty Images)


hide caption

toggle caption

National Archives/Interim Archives/Getty Images)

“The case clarified that anyone born in the United States was a citizen under the Court’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, regardless of the parent’s immigration status, and the case has been established precedent for more than 125 years,” according to the American Immigration Council.

That decision established the parameters of jus soli, or birthplace-based citizenship (as opposed to the ancestry-based form of birthright citizenship, known as jus sanguinis).

And the Supreme Court has reaffirmed it in the years since — including in the 1982 case Plyler v. Doe, which held that states cannot deny students a free public education based on their immigration status.

What exactly does Trump want to change?

Trump’s executive order asserts that children born to parents without legal status in the U.S. are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction and are, therefore, not entitled to U.S. citizenship.

The order also extends to children born to parents with temporary legal status in the U.S., such as foreign students or tourists.

Trump, who campaigned on cracking down on immigration, is not the first politician to call for revoking birthright citizenship.

“Starting in 1991, Congress has been introducing bills to end birthright citizenship,” Gelatt said. “None of those have passed into law.”

A draft of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

A draft of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, outlining the rights and privileges of American citizenship. It was ratified in 1868.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images/Hulton Archive/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Hulton Archive/Getty Images/Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Can birthright citizenship be revoked?

“Revoking this right would require amending the U.S. Constitution, or for the U.S. Supreme Court to diverge from centuries of established precedent and legal principles that date back to before the founding of this country,” according to the American Immigration Council. 

Congress could pass a new constitutional amendment, but it would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of states.

As NPR has reported, a small but vocal group of conservative legal scholars has argued for years that the 14th Amendment has long been misread and was not originally intended to give citizenship to the children of visitors. (During his first administration, Trump took steps aimed at cracking down on what he called “birth tourism.”)

“One problem, they believe, is that courts have misconstrued what the writers of the 14th Amendment intended with the phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ and that the amendment’s framers understood that the children of illegal aliens, like their parents, owed their loyalty to a nation that wasn’t the United States,” the National Constitution Center explains.

Some also believe the Wong Ark Kim decision was limited because his parents were in the U.S. legally at the time of his birth.

But most legal scholars do not think that birthright citizenship can be revoked at all — let alone by executive order.

“It will be litigated immediately and its prospects of surviving those court fights are slim, even before a Supreme Court stacked with conservative justices and Trump appointees,” writes Thomas Wolf, director of democracy initiatives at the Brennan Center for Justice.

How many people would be affected?

The Pew Research Center estimates that 1.3 million U.S.-born adults are children of immigrants without legal status, according to 2022 data.

The number of babies born in the U.S. to immigrants who entered the country illegally has declined in recent years: It was about 250,000 in 2016, a significant drop from a peak of roughly 390,000 in 2007, according to Pew.

But, as NPR has reported, immigrant rights advocates worry Trump’s order could affect multiple generations of children.

“As children born to unauthorized immigrants were themselves treated as unauthorized immigrants, that would grow the unauthorized immigrant population in the country,” said Gelatt, of the Migration Policy Institute. “And we could see even grandchildren of today’s unauthorized immigrants being born without U.S. citizenship.”

Data from the Migration Policy Institute suggests that by 2050, there would be 4.7 million unauthorized immigrants born in the U.S. — 1 million of whom would have two U.S.-born parents.

“What we see in countries where there is not birthright citizenship is that, you know, there are multigenerational groups of people who don’t have full membership,” Gelatt said. “They don’t have a full say in the governments that rule over them. And in some cases, people can also end up being stateless.”

Beyond the individual impact, Gelatt says the end of birthright citizenship could have repercussions for American society as a whole.

“We know that when people have legal status and the right to work legally in the United States and full membership in the country, that helps them to integrate, to thrive and to contribute more to our country, to our economy and our democracy.”

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Republicans hold onto a Florida House seat after help from Trump and Musk

Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox Get our free Inside Washington email Get our free Inside Washington email Republicans held onto a House seat in a special election in Florida Tuesday evening after a closer-than-expected contest, adding to the Republicans ‘ narrow majority.

Ex-Costa Rica president says US visa revoked after criticism of Trump | US news

Former Costa Rican president and Nobel winner Óscar Arias said on Tuesday that the US had revoked his visa to enter the country, weeks after he criticized Donald Trump on social media saying he was behaving like “a Roman emperor”. Arias, 84, was president between 1986 and 1990 and again between 2006 and 2010. A

Lawsuit claims Musk failed to make promised payments over 2024 petition signatures

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A federal lawsuit filed Tuesday in Pennsylvania accuses billionaire Elon Musk and the political action committee he started of failing to pay a suburban Philadelphia man more than $20,000 for getting people to sign a petition in favor of free speech and gun rights. The lawsuit seeking class-action status claims the man,

Elon Musk urges authorities ‘go after the generals’ behind Tesla attacks

Join Fox News for access to this content You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading. By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. Please

A Psychologist Explains Our ‘Parasocial’ Obsession With Celebrity Love

It’s one thing to admire a celebrity’s work — but it’s another to feel emotionally invested in their … More love life, as if it somehow affects our own. Here’s why we do it. Getty Images We live in a world where a famous couple’s breakup can feel like a personal betrayal, where fans grieve

Everything We Know About Lauren Sánchez and Jeff Bezos’ 2025 Wedding

Lauren Sánchez and Jeff Bezos are preparing to host the wedding of the year — or maybe even the century. After months of speculation, the mayor of Venice confirmed in late March that the billionaire and his soon-to-be bride are set to wed within the Italian city’s borders this summer. The ceremony will take place

To End the War in Ukraine, Trump Must Get Tough With Putin.

Practitioners of American statecraft have always used our leverage—positive and negative—to alter the behavior of others. For President Donald Trump, applying pressure on other countries and groups in order to advance U.S. interests comes very naturally. He’s done so with the Houthis in Yemen to stop their attacks on international shipping and on Israel—objectives that

Did Warren Buffet buy Elon Musk’s Tesla for $1 trillion? Know the truth

Every April 1, companies, news outlets, and brands join in on the tradition of playful pranks. While some jokes are harmless and lighthearted, others can cause confusion—especially when they involve high-profile figures and billion-dollar deals. This year, a satirical article claiming that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway had acquired Tesla for $1 trillion in cash quickly

Putin Aide Says He ‘Cannot Accept’ Trump Ukraine Deal

A high-ranking Russian official is swatting down President Donald Trump’s Ukraine peace demands days after the U.S. president said he was “p—ed off” at Vladimir Putin. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said the country “cannot accept” the U.S.-brokered peace deal, claiming that there is “no place for our main demand” in the agreement. “We

Wait, what! Did Warren Buffett buy Tesla for $1 trillion? Here’s the truth

Online users were shocked to learn that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway has bought Tesla for an astounding $1 trillion. A now-deleted article that was published earlier in a day claimed that the 94-year-old “Oracle of Omaha” apparently reached out to Elon Musk to make the landmark offer. Tesla CEO Elon Musk and Warren Buffett are

Jeff Bezos’ wedding and the world’s most extravagant nuptials

Here’s something you can’t get with next-day delivery: a lavish Venetian wedding. Amazon (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and his fiancee, media personality Lauren Sánchez, are getting married in the Italian city in an extravaganza that will run from June 24-26, Venetian officials confirmed over the weekend. Bezos’ $500 million megayacht, Koru, is expected to play

Everything Kanye West Said About Celebrities In Akademiks Interview

Ye took over the internet this past weekend when his hour-long interview with DJ Akademiks surfaced online. The 47-year-old remained true to his erratic, impulsive nature and doubled down on everything he has been saying on X over the last few weeks. Playboi Carti received the most smoke given his “transgression” against the artist formerly

Putin is waiting for Xi Jinping’s visit in May and is preparing a program

Russian dictator Vladimir Putin received Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in the Kremlin, and also said that he was waiting for Chinese leader Xi Jinping in May and was preparing a program, UNN reports with reference to Russian media. Details According to Russian media, the Russian dictator promised that a rich and beautiful program would

Xi Jinping speaks to President Murmu, stresses on ‘Dragon-Elephant tango’- The Week

On the 75th anniversary of the China-India diplomatic ties, President Xi Jinping spoke with Indian President Droupadi Murmu and stressed that both countries should work more closely together.  The relationship should take the form of a “Dragon-Elephant tango”, he said.  The Chinese and Indian leaders exchanged congratulatory messages on Tuesday marking the 75th anniversary of

China, India should strengthen ties in ‘Dragon-Elephant tango’: Xi Jinping | India News

China’s President Xi Jinping NEW DELHI: China and India’s relationship should take the form of a “Dragon-Elephant tango,” a dance between their emblematic animals, Chinese President Xi Jinping told his Indian counterpart Droupadi Murmu while exchanging congratulatory messages on Tuesday, marking the 75th anniversary of bilateral relations.Xi also said both countries should work more closely

27 Celebrity Parents Who Spoil Their Kids Or Refuse To

27 Celebrity Parents Who Spoil Their Kids Or Refuse To Many parents value providing a better life for their kids than they had growing up. However, when those parents are rich and famous, it can be easy to indulge them. Some celebs love to spoil their kids, while others absolutely refuse to. Here are 12

Beyond overcapacity: Chinese-style modernization and the clash of economic models

1 | European Chamber of Commerce in China and Roland Berger, “Overcapacity in China: An Impediment to the Party’s Reform Agenda,” 2016, https://www.europeanchamber.com.cn/en/publications-overcapacity-in-china; Lu Lanqing 陆澜清, “2016年钢铁行业如何去产能 (How to Reduce the Capacity of the Steel Industry in 2016),” 2016, https://www.qianzhan.com/analyst/detail/329/160225-2671dc64.html; Chinabgao 中国报告大厅, “我国钢铁行业2016年现状:亏损惨重产能过剩 (The Status Quo of China’s Steel Industry in 2016: Heavy Losses and

Investment Clinic — Should I keep betting on Warren Buffett?

This is an audio transcript of the Money Clinic podcast episode: ‘Investment Clinic — Should I keep betting on Warren Buffett?’ Claer Barrett My guest today has based her investment strategy on the wisdom of one man — Warren Buffett, the Sage of Omaha. Margo What I like about the investment philosophy is just the

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x