Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro vs. Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (global models)

You’re shopping for a mid-range phone in the €200–€300 range, and the Redmi Note 14 series clearly offers solid value. The problem? The lineup is packed with confusingly similar models -some even limited to 4G.

We can also understand how comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Global) and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Global) may be a tough choice. The price gap is minimal, and their spec sheets are nearly identical.

We’re here to help you figure out whether spending an extra €50-€60 for the Plus version is actually worth it – or if the standard Pro meets your needs just fine.

Table of Contents:

For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor’s assessment in the following text.

Size comparison

The Redmi Note 14 Pro and the Pro+ have very similar dimensions, with the latter having a slightly thicker and heavier chassis, probably due to the difference in materials. If not vegan leather, the Plus model gives you a glass back instead of plastic.

But for the most part, you won’t feel a difference and it’s no surprise. They both feature the same 6.67-inch display. In any case, you will get a more premium build with the Plus.

Display comparison

The two Redmis feature the exact same display panels. We didn’t find any difference in our measurements as well. Both devices boost to around 1,200 nits of max brightness.

Battery life

The two handsets offer similar battery life, which is expected given the shared hardware – identical displays and identical 5,110 mAh cells. The only difference is the chipset, and the Dimensity 7300 Ultra inside the Redmi Note 14 Pro seems to be the slightly more efficient one. The Non-Plus Pro model edges out the Pro+ in the call, web and video tests, gaining an extra hour of Active Use Score.

Charging speed

The charging rate is perhaps the most notable distinction between the two Redmis. The Pro+ offers blazing fast 120W charging, completing a full charging cycle within 21 minutes.

The non-Plus replenishes only around half of its battery’s charge in that time, and it takes more than an hour to complete a full charge.

Speaker test

There’s no detectable difference in the loudspeaker’s tuning and volume with our contenders. You get decent speakers with “Good” volume with either phone.

Performance

Naturally, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ runs on the more powerful chipset, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the non-Plus settles for a Dimensity 7300 Ultra SoC. Both chipsets fall into the mid-range segment. But while the Snapdragon is the more powerful of the two, the Dimensity silicon is apparently more effective, judging by the Redmi Note 14 Pro’s battery endurance.

Memory configurations are absolutely identical. Both phones start at 8GB/256GB and go up to 12GB/512GB. In either case, the storage chips are UFS 2.2, and there’s no microSD card slot.

Benchmark performance

In terms of raw performance, the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ outperforms the Redmi Note 14 Pro by 11% in CPU-bound benchmark tests and by merely 9% in combined workloads like AnTuTu 10. However, according to the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark test, which is primarily GPU-intensive, the Plus variant outperforms the standard Pro by about 24%, which is a significant gap. So for the gamers out there, the Pro+ might be the better option.

Camera comparison

The two Redmis share identical camera hardware featuring a solid 200MP main camera, aided by an 8MP ultrawide unit and a 2MP macro shooter. The selfie camera uses a 20MP sensor.

Should there be any notable difference in image quality or rendering style, it’s likely due to the ISP. That’s the only difference in this equation.

Image quality

As expected, the two devices deliver similar camera quality. There’s no meaningful difference in terms of sharpness, clarity and detail. However, there’s a small difference in rendering. For instance, the non-Plus produces warmer and potentially more likable images. The color temperature seems more accurate with warmer hues, whereas the Pro+ tends to render the scenes colder.


Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/1307s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/730s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/1227s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/739s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/2451s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/891s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/1008s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/546s)

Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x


Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/621s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/505s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/659s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/764s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/455s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/954s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/1027s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 50, 1/552s)

Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x

Additionally, the non-Plus offers a wider dynamic range and handles highlights better. That’s not always the case with the ultrawide cameras, though, where the two phones trade blows. Sometimes the Pro+ gets the exposure right, sometimes the non-Plus.

It’s trickier in low-light scenarios, though. The non-Plus model produces nicer ultrawide photos with better sharpness, detail and dynamic range. This applies to the 2x and 4x zoom modes. However, as far as the 1x Photo mode is concerned, the Pro+ outputs cleaner, sharper images with more natural shadows and more balanced highlights.


Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 1000, 1/10s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 4000, 1/17s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/33s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 1000, 1/33s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 1250, 1/10s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 4000, 1/17s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 1600, 1/33s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 1250, 1/33s)

Redmi Note 14 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x


Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 1250, 1/8s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 2000, 1/20s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 1000, 1/25s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 800, 1/25s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x (f/2.2, ISO 2000, 1/8s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 1x (f/1.6, ISO 2500, 1/20s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 2x (f/1.6, ISO 1600, 1/25s)
Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 4x (f/1.6, ISO 1000, 1/25s)

Redmi Note 14 Pro+: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 4x

The two phones produce identical selfies, but the non-Plus offers an ever so slightly wider dynamic range.


Selfies: Redmi Note 14 Pro (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/349s)
Selfies: Redmi Note 14 Pro+ (f/2.2, ISO 50, 1/483s)

Selfies: Redmi Note 14 Pro • Redmi Note 14 Pro+

Video quality

Below we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length, so it’s easier to compare to one another.

The non-Plus offers nicer videos with more accurate exposure and cleaner overall footage. The ultrawide video on the non-Plus has considerably better detail, both day and night.


Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 0.6x
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 1x
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 2x

Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 0.6x
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 1x
Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 2x

Redmi Note 14 Pro 4K frame grabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x


Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 0.6x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 1x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 2x

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 0.6x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 1x
Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 2x

Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 4K frame grabs: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 0.6x • 1x • 2x

Verdict

Despite the fact that the Pro+ is marketed as a higher-tier phone with more premium features, it’s not necessarily the better phone for most users. The Redmi Note 14 Pro and the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ share similar hardware, like display, battery capacity and cameras, but the non-Plus comes out on top in many categories, even though it’s the cheaper of the two.

For instance, the standard Pro offers slightly longer battery life and overall better camera experience (with a few exceptions). It also matches the Plus in the display and loudspeaker department.

The Pro+, on the other hand, compensates the slightly lower battery endurance with blazing-fast charging, flagship-level even. The handset also posts higher GPU benchmark scores and offers a more premium build (if you go for the glass back version).

But for the most part, these phones are very close siblings, as the name implies, so at the end of the day, you will be paying an extra €50 for the faster charging and small performance gain and it’s up to you to decide what those features are worth to you.


    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Global)

    Get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G (Global) for:

  • The largely identical user experience.
  • The slightly longer battery life.
  • The slightly better camera experience.
  • The lower price tag.

    Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Global)

    Get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Global) for:

  • The more powerful chipset.
  • The faster charging.
  • The more premium build.

Source link

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Google Pixel 9a vs. Pixel 9

With the Google Pixel 9a having launched a few months ago and the Google Pixel 9 hitting shelves nearly a year back, a common dilemma arises—should you opt for the newer mid-range model or stick with last year’s flagship? It’s a valid question, especially given their similar pricing and shared DNA. In Europe, the Pixel

Weekly poll: iOS 26 and Liquid Glass, love them or hate them?

iOS 26 is billed as the biggest overhaul of Apple’s smartphone operating system in a long while. It’s also part of an effort to create a unified UI across all Apple platforms. What do you think about it? The new UI, called Liquid Glass, was inspired by visionOS (for Apple’s XR headset) and it has

Singapore start-up on a green mission to keep mobile phones in use for longer

SINGAPORE – Singaporeans are replacing their phones every 2.7 years, contributing to some 2.9 million mobile phones being stowed away, a new study shows. But one Singapore start-up is hoping to change this and keep phones in circulation for five years here. This will be even longer than the global smartphone replacement cycle of 3.5

OnePlus Pad Lite’s specs and images surface

OnePlus recently launched the OnePlus Pad 3 with the Snapdragon 8 Elite at the helm, and a new rumor claims the next tablet by this Chinese brand will be called the OnePlus Pad Lite. The source claims that the OnePlus Pad Lite will be powered by the Helio G100 SoC and boot Android 15 with

Poco F7’s battery size and charging speed revealed by Flipkart

Poco is expected to unveil the Poco F7 this month, and while its launch date is yet to be confirmed by the brand, Indian e-commerce giant Flipkart has revealed some details about the Poco F7’s battery. The promo page set up by Flipkart on its website reveals that the Poco F7 will pack a 7,550

These are the 7 best fitness apps for Android (that aren’t Strava)

If you’re looking for the best fitness app to download onto your Android phone, you’re probably sick of having people recommend to you Strava. The social run app is ubiquitous, but if you’re not keen to overshare your workouts or don’t base your personality around your weekly 5k jog, you’ll want something different. Different is

vivo Y400 Pro’s official teaser corroborates its design

The vivo Y400 Pro, which we’ve been hearing about for the past few days, is “coming soon.” This revelation comes from vivo’s Indian branch, which dropped a short video clip that corroborates previous design leaks by showing the Y400 Pros’ rear side. You can see the vivo Y400 Pro in white color with a circular

Oppo A5 5G price in India leaks

The Oppo A5 5G was made official last month for some markets, along with the A5 4G and A5x 4G. The A5 5G is now rumored to be heading to India, where it should land “very soon”. The shot you can see below is purportedly showing the Indian model’s About screen. When it does arrive,

CMF Phone 2 Pro Review: The bar for cheap phones just got higher

Nothing’s been on a roll the past few years with its budget phone releases, including the the Nothing Phone 3a and 3a Pro models it launched earlier this year. While they’re both solid best cheap phone contenders, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is shaping up to be yet another ultra-affordable Android phone. And this one

Samsung Galaxy A56 is on its way to the US

Samsung launched the Galaxy A56 in March globally, but so far the company hasn’t started selling it officially in the US (you can find some units over there – use our widget below – but these are not models built for the US, instead they’re imported and meant for other regions). Samsung Galaxy A56 That,

Redmi K80 Ultra stops by Geekbench, confirms its chipset, memory, and Android version

A few hours ago, Redmi ramped up its teaser campaign for the upcoming K80 Ultra, which is the brand’s flagship smartphone. Now, the device has been spotted in the Geekbench database, where a prototype managed a single-core score of 2,679 and a multi-core score of 8,358. As always with benchmark results of pre-release devices, don’t

vivo releases more X Fold5 teaser images and a hands-on video

vivo is unveiling the X Fold5 in China on June 25, while its global launch may be coming on July 10. Ahead of the full announcement, the company has continued its teaser campaign on Weibo, where it has today released a bunch of new official images of the phone. There’s even a hands-on video now

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x