Lifestyle Management Showed Minimal Improvements for Chronic Low Back Pain

A combination of healthy lifestyle management and guideline-based care showed minimal improvements in chronic low back pain when compared with guideline-based care alone as the control, according to data published in JAMA Network Open.1

“Low back pain is a leading cause of disability globally and a significant public health problem,” wrote the authors. “Observational studies have linked the development and persistence of low back pain with lifestyle risk factors, such as being overweight, smoking, physical inactivity, and poor diet. Disability associated with back pain can also lead to compensatory unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, exposing people to increased risk of chronic diseases.”

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), low back pain is the number 1 cause of disability in the world, affecting 619 million people and estimated to reach 843 million by 2050.2 It occurs at any age and it’s more likely an individual experiences low back pain at some point in their life than not. However, despite WHO recognizing low back pain as an extremely prominent condition, it does not recommend weight-loss to treat it because of lacking evidence—a theme researchers noticed when exploring low back pain’s association with a healthy lifestyle.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), low back pain is the number 1 cause of disability in the world. | image credit: Jo Panuwat D / stock.adobe.com

READ MORE: Biofeedback Shows Promising Results in Treating Chronic Pain

To address the lack of knowledge regarding lifestyle management for low back pain, researchers focused on lifestyle risk factors like obesity, smoking, poor diet, and physical inactivity.

“In response to knowledge gaps about integrated care for low back pain and unhealthy lifestyle, we designed the HeLP (Healthy Lifestyle Program) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial,” they wrote.1 “The HeLP trial aimed to assess the benefits and potential harms of integrating management of unhealthy lifestyle with guideline-based care on low back pain disability compared with current guideline-recommended care alone.”

The HeLP trial was conducted between September 8, 2017, and December 30, 2020, to compare the HeLP intervention with guideline-based care for adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Investigators only focused on patients with at least 1 presenting lifestyle risk factor defined as patients being overweight, not meeting recommended amount of physical activity or fruit and/or vegetable consumption, or smoking.

“The HeLP intervention included guideline-based care plus back pain–specific healthy lifestyle education and support provided in clinical consultations, educational resources (booklet and web portal access), and telephone-based health coaching,” continued the authors. “Clinical consultations included up to 4 physiotherapist sessions and 1 dietitian session over 12 weeks, focusing on pain education lifestyle changes and self-management plans.”

For those in guideline-informed care, patients received back pain education, advice, and exercises. They were instructed to attend 3 consultations over a 12-week period. Clinicians working with patients in the control group did not give lifestyle advice aside from exercise recommendations. All trial participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the HeLP or control interventions.

A total of 344 individuals were included in the study (mean age, 50.2 years; 55% women) with 172 participants separated into each intervention group. However, after 26 weeks of follow up, only 142 participants and 147 participants from the HeLP and guideline-based groups provided data respectively.

“Integrating healthy lifestyle into care for low back pain resulted in a small improvement in disability at 26 weeks compared with current guideline-based care alone. There was also a small reduction in weight and improved physical quality of life, but no differences in pain intensity, mental quality of life, or smoking,” they wrote.1

With minimal improvements on lifestyle risks and low back pain, researchers believe this study helps bolster evidence for lifestyle interventions in the treatment of low back pain. Because WHO does not believe the proper evidence exists, it does not recommend lifestyle interventions for treating low back pain. But as future research is conducted similar to the current trial, providers will have alternate methods of approaching low back pain, or pain as a whole.

“This randomized clinical trial suggests that integrating management of healthy lifestyle risks for the care of patients with low back pain may provide a small improvement in disability compared with guideline-based care alone and large benefit for those who complied with at least half the treatment,” they concluded.1 “Treatment models that include support to address lifestyle behaviors hold promise for improving the disability burden of low back pain and providing opportunistic care for prevalent chronic disease risks in those with back pain.”

READ MORE: Pain Management Resource Center

Are you ready to elevate your pharmacy practice? Sign up today for our free Drug Topics newsletter and get the latest drug information, industry trends, and patient care tips, straight to your inbox.

References
1. Mudd E, Davidson SRE, Kamper SJ, et al. Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2453807. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807
2. Low back pain. World Health Organization. June 19, 2023. Accessed February 7, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/low-back-pain

Source link

Visited 2 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

UK and USA named as two of the world’s best countries for set-jetting – with 3,700 filming locations combined

Set-jetting – plotting a holiday around your favourite TV show or film – is a slice of the tourism industry that it’s estimated will be worth a princely £100billion by 2035. New research released this week from travel insurance comparison site InsureMyTrip ranks the best countries for seeking out cinematic locations, looking at factors including filming volume,

中年得痣

不去福岡,轉上井岡。不單是政治態度,更是工作態度。 中國沒有聖誕假期,江西腫瘤學會在Boxing Day開周年學術會議邀請醫生作主講,選址井岡山,醫生寓工作於娛樂,多留兩天探望這紅色基地。 理所當然,主要景點從毛澤東一九二七年井岡山長征為主打,其中包括大井舊居(他只住了三天),小井紅軍醫院(歷史上中國共產黨第一所醫院),黃洋界和八角樓,這裏見到毛澤東年輕肖像,他在八角樓養傷時三十多歲外貌俊俏(見圖),跟第三任妻子賀子珍很登對,醫生特別留意到當年下顎並沒有那標誌性的黑痣,即是說這痣是中年才出現,網上有人稱之為中年得痣(志),說是好兆頭。 是好是壞,還應從醫學角度解說,痣(Nevus)很常見但實分為不同類別,主要由色素細胞(Melanocytes)增生而成,絕大部分是良性,但未有癌變風險,故此留意身體上痣的改變是合理事宜。 大部分Nevus會在二十五歲前出現,視乎長大過程中接收多少陽光紫外光,每年可以有六至七顆新痣出現,年紀愈長,數字會減少至每年○至一,故此中年後出現新痣,便要留意到底是否有癌變徵兆。 醫生們向來提議用ABCDE來監察,A for Asymmetry,就是看是否有不對稱;B for Border irregularities,即是看邊緣是否不規則;C for Color variation,顏色若有深淺不同便要留意;D for Diameter,直徑超過六毫米要小心;E for Evolving,要用時間來觀察發展。 中年得痣,是好是壞還應問問醫生。 ▲ (專欄作家提供) Source link

The best places to visit in 2026 for big moments

Breadcrumb Trail Links Travel Guide Travel Travel International Ready for your next adventure abroad? These places are stepping into the limelight in a big way Published Jan 13, 2026  •  5 minute read The Dolomites, a stunning mountain range in northeastern Italy, is hosting the Winter Olympics in February, making it one of the best

Mumbai cardiologist explains why even ‘young, healthy-looking adults’ are at risk of heart attacks; shares warning signs

Heart disease is often associated with older adults, but even young, seemingly healthy individuals can be at risk. Lifestyle habits, stress, genetics, and hidden medical conditions can quietly affect heart health. In an interview with HT Lifestyle, Dr Pratik Giri, Consultant – Cardiology at Dr L H Hiranandani Hospital, Powai, Mumbai, explains why young people

Melbourne named one of the world’s best places to visit in 2026

If you’re deep in 2026 holiday planning mode, you don’t have to look far to find inspiration – with the world’s leading tastemakers (including the global travel editors at Time Out) dropping their definitive guide to the best places to visit in the year ahead. After taking the title as the best destination in the

Slow Is Healing: Why Ayurveda Warns Against Sudden Lifestyle Changes | Health and Fitness News

Last Updated:January 13, 2026, 07:34 IST Ayurveda emphasises slow, mindful healing over abrupt lifestyle overhauls. Dr. Bindu M. explains how gradual changes support balance, digestion, and long-term wellbeing. Ayurveda recognises that agni (digestive strength) needs time to stabilise, dhatus (body tissues) require steady nourishment, and the mind needs reassurance not force Practised for over 5,000 years,

減肥針

近年流行「減肥針」「瘦瘦針」,有些女性趨之若鶩,我見社交媒體上不乏「一針輕鬆瘦」「告別肥胖賀爾蒙」等廣告標語。 我也有認識的朋友急不及待地去打,首先,我根本不覺得她肥,現在社會仍吹捧「瘦=美」的扭曲價值觀。一味瘦,但又瘦到不健康、面黃黃和沒精打采的,好嗎?其次,要減肥就要好好注意運動和飲食,這類減肥針有副作用且會反彈,根本不能長期打。 先了解減肥針源起:GLP-1(腸促胰島素肽)原是人體腸道自然分泌的賀爾蒙,功能是促進胰島素分泌、抑制食慾、延緩胃部排空。減肥針就是含有腸泌素(GLP-1)類似物的處方注射藥物,本用於醫治第二型糖尿病,其後醫生與研究人員意外發現,使用者體重明顯下降,從而變成減肥新寵。在醫療界,本只幫患癡肥病人(BMI≥30)作體重管理,但近年卻變成吸引女士們的「瘦瘦針」。 愛美之人要清醒,針無兩頭利。此類針劑絕非完美無瑕。常見副作用包括噁心、嘔吐、腹瀉、便秘等腸胃不適。去年九月在Dermatology and Therapy(Vol. 15)刊登的研究報告顯示,這類減肥針的副作用不能忽視,包括皮疹、大皰性皮疹、血管炎等表現,傷口癒合能力受損,且更增加胃腸道、急性胰臟炎、膽結石和膽囊炎的風險。以上副作用,當然打減肥針的地方不會主動告訴客人或病人。此外,停藥後體重容易反彈,若未同步調整飲食與生活習慣,根本效果短暫。 與其外求針藥,不如靠自己促進身體自然分泌GLP-1:一、高纖飲食:膳食纖維在腸道發酵時,能刺激腸道細胞分泌GLP-1。二、優質蛋白質:魚和蛋有助促進GLP-1釋放並增加飽足感。三、攝取有益脂肪:適量堅果、Omega-3對賀爾蒙分泌有正面影響。四、每日運動:包括帶氧與肌力訓練。五、充足睡眠:睡眠不良會擾亂GLP-1分泌。 世上沒有不勞而獲之事,靠減肥針減了體重,身體其他地方要還。 Source link

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x