Lifestyle Management Showed Minimal Improvements for Chronic Low Back Pain

A combination of healthy lifestyle management and guideline-based care showed minimal improvements in chronic low back pain when compared with guideline-based care alone as the control, according to data published in JAMA Network Open.1

“Low back pain is a leading cause of disability globally and a significant public health problem,” wrote the authors. “Observational studies have linked the development and persistence of low back pain with lifestyle risk factors, such as being overweight, smoking, physical inactivity, and poor diet. Disability associated with back pain can also lead to compensatory unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, exposing people to increased risk of chronic diseases.”

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), low back pain is the number 1 cause of disability in the world, affecting 619 million people and estimated to reach 843 million by 2050.2 It occurs at any age and it’s more likely an individual experiences low back pain at some point in their life than not. However, despite WHO recognizing low back pain as an extremely prominent condition, it does not recommend weight-loss to treat it because of lacking evidence—a theme researchers noticed when exploring low back pain’s association with a healthy lifestyle.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), low back pain is the number 1 cause of disability in the world. | image credit: Jo Panuwat D / stock.adobe.com

READ MORE: Biofeedback Shows Promising Results in Treating Chronic Pain

To address the lack of knowledge regarding lifestyle management for low back pain, researchers focused on lifestyle risk factors like obesity, smoking, poor diet, and physical inactivity.

“In response to knowledge gaps about integrated care for low back pain and unhealthy lifestyle, we designed the HeLP (Healthy Lifestyle Program) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial,” they wrote.1 “The HeLP trial aimed to assess the benefits and potential harms of integrating management of unhealthy lifestyle with guideline-based care on low back pain disability compared with current guideline-recommended care alone.”

The HeLP trial was conducted between September 8, 2017, and December 30, 2020, to compare the HeLP intervention with guideline-based care for adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Investigators only focused on patients with at least 1 presenting lifestyle risk factor defined as patients being overweight, not meeting recommended amount of physical activity or fruit and/or vegetable consumption, or smoking.

“The HeLP intervention included guideline-based care plus back pain–specific healthy lifestyle education and support provided in clinical consultations, educational resources (booklet and web portal access), and telephone-based health coaching,” continued the authors. “Clinical consultations included up to 4 physiotherapist sessions and 1 dietitian session over 12 weeks, focusing on pain education lifestyle changes and self-management plans.”

For those in guideline-informed care, patients received back pain education, advice, and exercises. They were instructed to attend 3 consultations over a 12-week period. Clinicians working with patients in the control group did not give lifestyle advice aside from exercise recommendations. All trial participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the HeLP or control interventions.

A total of 344 individuals were included in the study (mean age, 50.2 years; 55% women) with 172 participants separated into each intervention group. However, after 26 weeks of follow up, only 142 participants and 147 participants from the HeLP and guideline-based groups provided data respectively.

“Integrating healthy lifestyle into care for low back pain resulted in a small improvement in disability at 26 weeks compared with current guideline-based care alone. There was also a small reduction in weight and improved physical quality of life, but no differences in pain intensity, mental quality of life, or smoking,” they wrote.1

With minimal improvements on lifestyle risks and low back pain, researchers believe this study helps bolster evidence for lifestyle interventions in the treatment of low back pain. Because WHO does not believe the proper evidence exists, it does not recommend lifestyle interventions for treating low back pain. But as future research is conducted similar to the current trial, providers will have alternate methods of approaching low back pain, or pain as a whole.

“This randomized clinical trial suggests that integrating management of healthy lifestyle risks for the care of patients with low back pain may provide a small improvement in disability compared with guideline-based care alone and large benefit for those who complied with at least half the treatment,” they concluded.1 “Treatment models that include support to address lifestyle behaviors hold promise for improving the disability burden of low back pain and providing opportunistic care for prevalent chronic disease risks in those with back pain.”

READ MORE: Pain Management Resource Center

Are you ready to elevate your pharmacy practice? Sign up today for our free Drug Topics newsletter and get the latest drug information, industry trends, and patient care tips, straight to your inbox.

References
1. Mudd E, Davidson SRE, Kamper SJ, et al. Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2453807. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807
2. Low back pain. World Health Organization. June 19, 2023. Accessed February 7, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/low-back-pain

Source link

Visited 2 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Keep heartbreak purely emotional with healthy lifestyle choices

Retirement, fitness and walking with dog and couple in neighborhood park for relax, health and sports workout. Love, wellness and pet with old man and senior woman in outdoor morning walk together While we’re busy celebrating Valentine’s weekend with our significant other, family or friends, let’s not forget to show our own hearts some love

「Six Seven !」

「Six Seven !」(6-7)我必須承認,初次被年輕人們問我知否這詞彙時,還以為是新一代的粗口代名詞。 原來非也,「Six Seven」是二○二五年度詞彙,現時在TikTok和Gen Alpha(Alpha世代,二○一○年後出生)間爆紅用語。它於我像一串敲打着世代之門的密碼,身為研究傳播學的人,我竟在這些碎片裏迷了路。 我像個舉着放大鏡在兒童塗鴉前苦思的考古學家,忍不住追問:「不是粗口的話,到底代表甚麼?表達甚麼意思?」眾年輕人靜默後爆出哄笑。短髮女孩答:「它甚麼都不是啊!」他們展示影片中的人,可在成功、失敗或看到迷因時大喊「Six Seven」,原來,這詞並無具體定義,是萬用感歎詞,表達荒謬、無聊、搞笑或純粹圈內共鳴。重點就是年輕人覺得「毋須解釋或解讀,在於大家都明(懂就懂)」的氛圍——語氣沒嘲諷沒啥非表達不可之意,說的人和聽的人,只有某種共享荒謬的親密感。我愣住,忽然想起傳播理論課上自己曾斬釘截鐵地說:「所有流行語必然承載社會意涵。」此刻,這句話像回力鏢般擊中眉心。 另一男孩補充:「就像我們突然說『香蕉會飛呀!』一樣,沒啥意思,亦沒啥想表達,純粹夠無聊!懂就懂,不懂亦毋須解釋,讓他們不懂就好!」我忽然懂了。這代人在資訊海嘯中長大,意義被過度生產、過度解讀。於是「Six Seven」成了他們的避難所——一個刻意空洞的符號,拒絕被定義、拒絕承載重量。它唯一的功能,就是標記「此時此地,我們一起胡言亂語」的瞬間。這或許是年輕世代的一種身份認同,特點是故意讓家長、老師、大人聽不懂,以此建立「屬於我們的內梗(inside joke)」。 或許,每個世代都需要點「毫無意義」的語言符號,去逃脫意義的牢籠。Alpha世代,顛覆了我的世代,「Six Seven」令我發現:雖然一把年紀,世界還有太多現象我不懂。 Source link

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x