More intense exercise may not benefit life span as much

Two twins exercising with a resistance band pulling it in the opposite directionShare on Pinterest
Exercising more than the recommended amount may not benefit life span as much as previously thought. Leicarras/Getty Images
  • Past studies have shown that certain lifestyle choices, such as exercising regularly, may help extend longevity.
  • A new study found that higher levels of physical activity may not benefit life span as much as previously thought.
  • However, experts say regular activity is crucial for overall health and life quality.

For as long as there has been science, researchers have continued to look for ways to help us live longer.

“The length of the life span reflects the overall health of individuals,” Elina Sillanpää, PhD, associate professor in the Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland told Medical News Today.

“Many people still die from diseases that are partially preventable through healthy lifestyles. For example, physical activity recommendations are based on studies investigating the associations between activity and life span. Physical activity can affect various diseases and the aging process. Life span is an outcome that may combine all potential health benefits of physical activity,” she said.

In one of the newest studies from the project, Sillanpää and her team report that higher levels of physical activity may not benefit lifespan as much as previously thought.

For this study, researchers analyzed health data from almost 23,000 Finnish twins born before 1958 who had been part of the Finnish Twin Cohort.

Study participants had their physical activity levels evaluated three times — in 1975, 1981, and 1990. And the mortality rate of participants was followed up until the end of 2020.

“Previous animal and twin studies suggested that the association between physical activity and lifespan is not as straightforward as commonly thought, which piqued our interest in this topic,” Sillanpää said.

“We believed that by using novel methods — such as polygenic scoring to determine inherited disease risk, epigenetic clocks to estimate biological age, and longitudinal twin designs to adjust for genetic confounding — we could produce new evidence on this topic,” she explained.

Study participants were divided into four groups — sedentary, moderately active, active, and highly active — based on their physical activity data over the 15-year follow-up.

When the different groups were analyzed at the 30-year follow-up point, researchers found those in the sedentary and moderately active groups had a 7% lower risk of mortality, which was the highest benefit percentage amongst the four groups.

Additionally, researchers found that meeting the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommended 150 to 300 minutes of moderate or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous activity per week did not lower participants’ mortality risk or change their genetic disease risk.

“Our results suggest that meeting WHO recommendations for physical activity is sufficient for life span benefits, and more intense exercise does not provide additional benefits. Similar results have been shown before. However, we also demonstrated that the association of physical activity and life span may be prone to bias due to several factors.”
— Elina Sillanpää, PhD

“People with diseases or underlying health conditions may be less active, and it’s natural for individuals close to death to move less, which may cause reverse causality,” she continued.

“Other lifestyle factors may also explain the association; physically active individuals usually smoke less and have healthier diets. It’s important to note that physical activity is a voluntary behavior, and our genetic preferences partially explain whether exercise is easy for us or not. Some genetic variation may also be associated with healthy behavior and lower risk of common diseases, as shown by our group’s previous studies,” Sillanpää said.

MNT had the opportunity to speak with Cheng-Han Chen, MD, a board certified interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA, about this study.

“This prospective study followed a group of people over many decades and found that their level of physical activity did not seem to correspond to their risk of mortality,” Chen commented. “This suggests that the health benefits of exercise may be confounded by other factors, and that exercise is just one of many behaviors (including eating a balanced diet, avoiding smoking, etc.) that people should try to follow in order to improve their overall health.”

“Other studies will be needed to determine whether these findings are applicable to a wider population of people besides Finns,” Chen added.

After reading this study, readers may wonder why they should continue to exercise if it doesn’t help increase their life span.

MNT posed this question to Tracy Zaslow, MD, primary care sports medicine specialist at Cedars-Sinai Orthopaedics in Los Angeles and a team physician for Angel City Football Club and LA Galaxy, about this study.

“I would say number one, there’s a lot of studies that do show that life span is increased,” Zaslow explained. “But probably even more importantly, no matter what, the quality of life is improved by physical activity, in the sense that just being able to do more, more easily without pain.”

“We know that the amount of muscle that you have decreases with age. You lose muscle as you age, starting pretty early on — 30s (and) 40s. So we need to work extra as we approach those decades to keep that strength so that it’s easy to move around.”
— Tracy Zaslow, MD

“I think a lot of people stop their exercise because it’s hard to pick up the golf ball when it goes in the hole — they can’t get up from (a crouched) position,” Zaslow added. “And if you just work on the strength of the legs, of the glutes, of the core muscles, then continuing those activities becomes an easy task, and a more engaging and enjoyable task.”

Source link

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Princess Charlene’s 125-acre haven is the secret to her healthy lifestyle

Princess Charlene‘s life before becoming a working royal placed a huge focus on health and fitness as an Olympic swimmer. Prince Albert‘s wife, 47, who married into the Monegasque royal family in 2011, swam for South Africa in the 2000 Olympics and at the 1998 and 2002 Commonwealth Games, having made her professional swimming debut

團隊黑洞

工作場景內,有一種人,堪稱「團隊黑洞」——他們彷彿自帶引力場,能將團隊的精力、效率,甚至耐性都吸進無底深淵。更可怕的是,這類人往往具備三大「黑洞特質」,層層遞進。 第一層:能力不足:這本非死罪,惟能力不足卻連份內基本工作都不達標,跟進的項目永遠甩甩漏漏、錯漏百出。 第二層:拙,本可原諒,但又拙又懶,不思進補,乃可恨之始。知不足,若提早準備、反覆檢查,總能將勤補拙。但「黑洞族」偏不,他們懶得做多一步。拙是能力問題,懶是態度問題,兩者疊加極可恨。 第三層:永遠是別人的錯,這是「黑洞」成形的終極封印,最致命。若被指出問題,他瞬間啟動「免責力場」,化身全宇宙最無辜的受害者。 曾親歷一役:推新產品,死綫迫在眉睫,但事交「黑洞族」負責,結果錯漏百出,若產品這樣推出,必是災難,累得其他人要漏夜執手尾。到產品推出,有人問:「產品為何宣傳配套全無動靜?」對方歎氣秒回:「唉,公司高層佔用資源,宣傳新同事又毫無經驗,無計。」我聽畢,差點拍枱大罵:「閣下身為產品負責人,不懂得向上司爭取宣傳資源?新同事新手不熟,你不懂指示和跟進叫他配合執行?」在他那套邏輯裏,上有高層掣肘,下有新手拖累,左右有部門不配合,整個世界都在與他為敵,唯獨他潔白無瑕,毫無責任。這種「無責思維」,是團隊協作中最劇烈的腐蝕劑。 集齊三點者,注定成事不足、敗事有餘,不僅自己停滯,更會磨損他人。經驗之談:與這類人合作,如同拖着秤砣游泳,能掙扎到彼岸已屬萬幸,別奢求速度與姿態。 若對方是年輕人,我還是會願意苦口婆心的。若已屆中年者,積習入骨,炒得就炒,若不在我能炒範圍的話,那就慳返啖氣遠離黑洞。皆因時間寶貴,能量有限,與其將精力消耗在填補無底黑洞,不如專注於與那些負責、自省、遇事會積極處理的夥伴並肩作戰。無他,遠離「無責族」,是為了呵護那點珍貴的、用來建設而非內耗之元氣。 Source link

UAE health survey highlights lifestyle risks and obesity concerns – Dubai Eye 103.8

WAM A major national survey, released by the Ministry of Health and Prevention (MoHAP), has found large numbers of adults in the UAE are not getting enough physical activity, while obesity, high blood pressure and high cholesterol remain widespread. The findings come from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2024–2025, which was conducted in collaboration

Combat veteran and lifestyle medicine physician is helping shape digital health

As a physician, veteran and lifestyle medicine leader, Regan A. Stiegmann, DO, MPH, has built a career defined by service. In May of 2011, Dr. Stiegmann enlisted in the United States Air Force (USAF) Reserve, where she served as a flight surgeon. In the years since, she has combined her osteopathic medical training with her

一條內褲走天涯

最近台灣網絡熱議一則「六日只穿一條內褲」的旅行糾紛,有位潔癖男生發現女友旅行期間只帶一套內衣褲,穿足全程。 男生在社交討論區抒發感受,說拍拖時以為是「香噴噴的漂亮女孩」,結果同居後才發現她不修邊幅……碗放三天不洗,事主出差回家,會發現垃圾廚餘放一個禮拜都不丟、洗澡完排水孔的頭髮又不撿等,事主訴說,崩潰到考慮想分手。為了一條內褲想分手,看似荒唐,卻赤裸裸揭開親密關係中常被忽略的戰場——個人衞生差距,或是壓垮愛情的最後一根稻草。 伴侶一起生活的衝突源頭,不少與生活習慣差異有關。其中「衞生標準落差」是關鍵——你以為愛的是飄飄仙氣的甜姐兒,同居後才發現對方生活得猶如「麻甩佬」,這種衝擊確實需要點時間消化。那位「香噴噴漂亮女孩」的同居真相,活脫脫是現代親密關係的「開盲盒」體驗——打開前以為是限量版香水,打開後才發現是帶酸餿味的發酵廚餘。故事殘酷揭示真理:約會時的精緻,很多時只是「限期優惠裝」;近距離的真面目,才是見真章時刻。 情侶旅行,正是這場「真相揭露戰」的加速器與高倍顯微鏡。從執行李那刻開始,已是一場「衞生哲學」的預演:你帶齊消毒噴霧、獨立包裝袋,她卻信奉「一條內褲走天涯」。到了異地,壓力與疲勞更會讓所有隱藏習慣原形畢露。 所以說,與其說旅行是浪漫催化劑,不如說是關係的「壓力測試軟件」。它能將未來數十年可能爆發的「家居衞生戰爭」、「責任分工矛盾」,壓縮在短短數日內預演一遍。那條穿了六天的內褲,不僅是一個衞生問題,更是一面照出彼此價值觀、自律程度與互相尊重底綫的鏡子。 若能通過這關「旅行照妖鏡」,恭喜,你們或許已練就「接納彼此最真實模樣」的功力;若然不能,也未必是壞事。早崩潰、早發現、早抉擇,總好過將來在婚書簽妥後,才為誰該清理排水孔的頭髮而日夜嗌霎。畢竟,愛情可以盲目,但一同相處,卻需要一雙能忍受些許灰塵的慧眼。 Source link

Five lifestyle tweaks to help you live well for longer

Socialising with your friends is an enjoyable way of boosting your longevity (Credit: BBC) A mindset change As we strive to live well, we might assume we need to make significant changes. But as I pointed to earlier, research shows that small, consistent changes are key to greater physical and mental wellbeing, rather making radical

近年獨愛Jackson Wang

芸芸年輕表演者中,我獨愛看Jackson Wang(王嘉爾)。當今華語娛樂圈中,能真正稱得上「國際巨星」的年輕偶像,只有他。 這位香港出生的表演者,在海外訪問中,展現出一種「真我」風采–英文流利如母語,對答機智從容,談音樂理念、文化碰撞乃至個人價值觀,皆渾灑自如,毫無滯礙。近排他回港一陣子,接受多間本地媒體訪問,無偶包(偶像包袱)、不扮嘢、坦蕩蕩,甚至承認自己有醫美,率真快人快語,是我喜歡的類型。 偶包,在當今藝能界幾是標準配備。然而,在Jackson身上,卻沒有這種刻意經營的距離感。即使已達「國際範」成就,成為首位華人獨唱歌手登上Coachella音樂節主舞台、社媒追隨者以千萬計,受訪談起香港,最念念不忘的,竟是沙田新城市廣場和好運中心;還說當年學校舞會,以$399在旺角潮流特區買下一整套西裝……能毫不猶豫地道出「地標」,說明其內心深處,依舊與這片土地的尋常脈動緊緊相連。 許多藝人一旦躍升國際,急於擁抱一套「高級」敘事。Jackson卻反其道而行,在中外訪問中,他常坦蕩談及作為運動員(前劍擊代表)轉型藝人的艱辛,談在香港與國際間尋找身份定位的掙扎,甚至其低潮和抑鬱症。這種自然的真實,恰恰打破東西方對亞洲偶像「含蓄拘謹」的刻板印象。 尤其難得的是,他的語言與文化切換,並非「表演」,而是融於骨血的靈活流動。面對西方媒體,他以流利英語談中國文化;回到華語語境,又能用廣東話細數兒時趣事。這種自如,建基於他自身「文化混雜性」的自信,不必割裂任何一部分的自我去迎合某個市場。 Jackson示範出所謂「國際化」並非褪去本土色彩,而是帶着自身文化的根,坦然而自信地走向世界。從沙田和馬鞍山(兒時居所)到世界舞台,他走了一條很遠的路,但心裏那張地圖,起點與座標始終清晰。這種沒有偶包的真實和坦然,比任何光芒都更具力量。 Source link

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x