More intense exercise may not benefit life span as much

Two twins exercising with a resistance band pulling it in the opposite directionShare on Pinterest
Exercising more than the recommended amount may not benefit life span as much as previously thought. Leicarras/Getty Images
  • Past studies have shown that certain lifestyle choices, such as exercising regularly, may help extend longevity.
  • A new study found that higher levels of physical activity may not benefit life span as much as previously thought.
  • However, experts say regular activity is crucial for overall health and life quality.

For as long as there has been science, researchers have continued to look for ways to help us live longer.

“The length of the life span reflects the overall health of individuals,” Elina Sillanpää, PhD, associate professor in the Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences at the University of Jyväskylä in Finland told Medical News Today.

“Many people still die from diseases that are partially preventable through healthy lifestyles. For example, physical activity recommendations are based on studies investigating the associations between activity and life span. Physical activity can affect various diseases and the aging process. Life span is an outcome that may combine all potential health benefits of physical activity,” she said.

In one of the newest studies from the project, Sillanpää and her team report that higher levels of physical activity may not benefit lifespan as much as previously thought.

For this study, researchers analyzed health data from almost 23,000 Finnish twins born before 1958 who had been part of the Finnish Twin Cohort.

Study participants had their physical activity levels evaluated three times — in 1975, 1981, and 1990. And the mortality rate of participants was followed up until the end of 2020.

“Previous animal and twin studies suggested that the association between physical activity and lifespan is not as straightforward as commonly thought, which piqued our interest in this topic,” Sillanpää said.

“We believed that by using novel methods — such as polygenic scoring to determine inherited disease risk, epigenetic clocks to estimate biological age, and longitudinal twin designs to adjust for genetic confounding — we could produce new evidence on this topic,” she explained.

Study participants were divided into four groups — sedentary, moderately active, active, and highly active — based on their physical activity data over the 15-year follow-up.

When the different groups were analyzed at the 30-year follow-up point, researchers found those in the sedentary and moderately active groups had a 7% lower risk of mortality, which was the highest benefit percentage amongst the four groups.

Additionally, researchers found that meeting the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommended 150 to 300 minutes of moderate or 75 to 150 minutes of vigorous activity per week did not lower participants’ mortality risk or change their genetic disease risk.

“Our results suggest that meeting WHO recommendations for physical activity is sufficient for life span benefits, and more intense exercise does not provide additional benefits. Similar results have been shown before. However, we also demonstrated that the association of physical activity and life span may be prone to bias due to several factors.”
— Elina Sillanpää, PhD

“People with diseases or underlying health conditions may be less active, and it’s natural for individuals close to death to move less, which may cause reverse causality,” she continued.

“Other lifestyle factors may also explain the association; physically active individuals usually smoke less and have healthier diets. It’s important to note that physical activity is a voluntary behavior, and our genetic preferences partially explain whether exercise is easy for us or not. Some genetic variation may also be associated with healthy behavior and lower risk of common diseases, as shown by our group’s previous studies,” Sillanpää said.

MNT had the opportunity to speak with Cheng-Han Chen, MD, a board certified interventional cardiologist and medical director of the Structural Heart Program at MemorialCare Saddleback Medical Center in Laguna Hills, CA, about this study.

“This prospective study followed a group of people over many decades and found that their level of physical activity did not seem to correspond to their risk of mortality,” Chen commented. “This suggests that the health benefits of exercise may be confounded by other factors, and that exercise is just one of many behaviors (including eating a balanced diet, avoiding smoking, etc.) that people should try to follow in order to improve their overall health.”

“Other studies will be needed to determine whether these findings are applicable to a wider population of people besides Finns,” Chen added.

After reading this study, readers may wonder why they should continue to exercise if it doesn’t help increase their life span.

MNT posed this question to Tracy Zaslow, MD, primary care sports medicine specialist at Cedars-Sinai Orthopaedics in Los Angeles and a team physician for Angel City Football Club and LA Galaxy, about this study.

“I would say number one, there’s a lot of studies that do show that life span is increased,” Zaslow explained. “But probably even more importantly, no matter what, the quality of life is improved by physical activity, in the sense that just being able to do more, more easily without pain.”

“We know that the amount of muscle that you have decreases with age. You lose muscle as you age, starting pretty early on — 30s (and) 40s. So we need to work extra as we approach those decades to keep that strength so that it’s easy to move around.”
— Tracy Zaslow, MD

“I think a lot of people stop their exercise because it’s hard to pick up the golf ball when it goes in the hole — they can’t get up from (a crouched) position,” Zaslow added. “And if you just work on the strength of the legs, of the glutes, of the core muscles, then continuing those activities becomes an easy task, and a more engaging and enjoyable task.”

Source link

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Joyce獨家限定 WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO花之色

談日本時裝品牌,始終Yohji Yamamoto、Issey Miyake和Comme des Garcons這三巨頭最廣為人認知。 當中Yohji近年最積極開拓中價位市場,2022年推出一個專門以聯乘掛帥的WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO系列,今天位於尖沙咀的Joyce更首次為該系列開設期間限定店。 已踏入83歲高齡的Yohji Yamamoto,在巴黎時裝展看到他出現於台前,或出席Y-3的時裝展,已感到這位當代的時裝大師步履蹣跚,幸好他身旁的兒子總是扶着老爸照顧有加。 Yohji曾經在訪問中表示永不言休,甚至希望死在工作枱中,可見這位時裝大師對創作的熱誠,而品牌近年亦積極開發中價位的系列,雖然未必出自他的手筆,但例如GROUNR Y和最初只在網上發售的S’YTE於市場上均做得不俗。而隨着時裝界聯乘系列一發不可收拾,品牌的智囊團以WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO為名,設立一個和不同時裝品牌和藝術家合作的聯乘品牌,過往合作過的對象非常多元化,例如有來自京都的一澤帆布、宮澤理惠和丈夫森田剛組成的創意工作室MOSS STUDIO等。 香港獨家 今次Joyce為WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO開設期間限定店,除了將大家熟悉的NEIGHBORHOOD與WILDSIDE合作的系列引入到港外,最吸引之處還帶來兩個屬本地的獨家項目,包括「最易入口」的兩款限定tee,Tee上的圖案設計靈感源自象徵香港的洋紫荊。而另一款圖案則融合仙人掌之花與鬱金香,以香港夜景及霓虹燈中常見的紅色為主調,將都市能量與WILDSIDE的創意美學融合。 此外,值得留意的是找來本地藝術家Chris Li創立的手工珠寶品牌Gold Steed Atelier(金駿工作室),他以黑鈀金屬工藝製作出「Distressed Orchid(殘損蘭花)」系列,限定推出別針、胸針、吊墜及頸鏈等多款首飾,首飾以深邃炭黑色為基調,融合細緻金屬銅綠與自然侵蝕肌理,筆者親身觀看,其細緻程度不比來自日本主綫Yohji Yamamoto RIEFE首飾系列遜色,從中可以看到香港設計界臥虎藏龍者眾,只是未有機會被大家看見,如今標籤上加入大師之名,就更加值得大力支持! Info WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO JOYCE期間限定 日期:即日至6月11日 時間:11am – 9pm ==================================== 圖片:品牌提供 產品查詢:Joyce(2367 9128) 責任編輯:何偉雄 ▲ WILDSIDE YOHJI YAMAMOTO JOYCE期間限定只在尖沙咀Joyce出現。 ▲ 只在香港發售的兩款獨家tee。(各 $700) ▲ 該系列首飾以Distressed Orchid為主題。(頸鏈 $7,380) ▲ Gold Steed

Top 10 Most Visited Countries in the World

If your suitcase has been giving you sad eyes from the closet corner, 2025 might be the year to dust it off! As travellers around the globe scramble to make up for lost time, airports are buzzing like beehives, and famous landmarks are playing host to selfie sticks once again. The World Economic Outlook Report

飲到最後

電影《夜王》有句對白,無論看幾多次,都是我最喜歡的,那就是:「如果真係要熄燈,我哋一定要飲到最後。」 這句話指的不僅是尖東的夜場,更可以是一個地方。「飲到最後」,是個人選擇。每人的選擇不同,當你明知一個地方遲早會熄燈,又或正在熄燈,你會怎麼做?趁燈熄前匆匆拉着行李趕快走人?還是開始嫌棄它光綫漸暗、牆角剝落,失去以前的風采?抑或極度恐慌一味得個驚字?但我相信有些人,包括我在內,是明知燈會熄,還是會選擇坐下來,把杯中的酒慢慢喝完。而且,還要用以往美好日子的樣式飲到最後。 這幾年,香港的氣氛在變。有些熟悉的招牌拆了,有些熱鬧的角落靜了,有些曾經理所當然的人與事,像被風吹散的煙。選擇留低飲到最後的人,不是因為天真,而是因為曾見過那個地方最好的時候,也記得那些好是怎麼一點一滴建立起來的。 留低,是一種姿態的選擇。像一個酒客,明知酒吧會在凌晨兩點準時關門,但他不會在一點半就奪門而出。他會跟老朋友碰杯,說幾句真心話,把最後一滴酒也喝得從容。熄燈之後,外面是天黑,但你心裏有光。那光,是記憶是溫度,是你曾經在這裏笑過、拼過、掙扎過、美好過的證據。 如果一個地方只在她風光時才有人肯留下,那這種關係也太廉價和功利了。留低飲到最後,不是消極地等死,而是積極地選擇在一個地方繼續好好過自己的日子。依我說,何止要飲到最後,還要繼續痛快地、豪情地、無懼地去飲。客觀形勢熄燈與否,不是我們能控制,但姿態如何,是自己揀的。或許,選擇飲到最後的人,也是出於一種對某個地方不言而喻的義氣。因為真正在乎一個地方,不是在它發光時鼓掌,而是在它黯淡時,仍願意為它舉杯。 Source link

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x