Association between air pollution and lifestyle with the risk of developing mild cognitive impairment and dementia in individuals with cardiometabolic diseases

Baseline characteristics of the participants

Table 1 depicts the participant characteristics. Out of 438,681 participants, 75,056 (17.11%) had CMDs. Among them, 15.12% had one CMDs, 1.90% had two CMDs, and 0.09% had three CMDs. Individuals with one, two, or three CMDs were compared to those without CMDs. The former group was older, had more males and retirees, lower education levels, poorer economic status, lower normal BMI rates, fewer carriers of the APOE ε4 gene, more dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia, and higher usage of lipid-lowering drugs and aspirin. Furthermore, this group has a high proportion of patients with moderate and severe serum 25(OH)D deficiency and hypertension, and a relatively low proportion of patients with depression. Significant statistical differences in exposure to ambient air pollutants and healthy lifestyle scores were found between people with and without CMDs, with a higher proportion of people with CMDs being exposed to medium and high levels of ambient air pollutants compared to those without CMDs. Healthy lifestyle scores of 0–1, 2–3, and 4 were higher in individuals with CMDs compared to those without CMDs, whereas the proportion of scores of 5–7 was lower in those with CMDs.

Table 1 Characteristics of participants with or without Cardiometabolic diseases.

The risk of developing mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia in patients with CMDs was 1.951, 1.554, 1.216, and 2.032 times higher than in those without CMDs, respectively [mild cognitive impairment: HR = 1.951, 95% CI: 1.404, 2.710; all-cause dementia: HR = 1.554, 95% CI: 1.473, 1.640; Alzheimer’s disease: HR = 1.216, 95% CI: 1.204, 1.228; vascular dementia: HR = 2.032, 95% CI: 1.799, 2.296]. The risk of developing mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia in the population seems to increase with the increase in the number of CMDs. Patients with all three types of CMDs have the highest risk of total dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia (Table 2). Furthermore, the rates of mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia per 1,000 person-years were 0.038 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.04), 0.943 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97), 0.455 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.47) and 0.155 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.17), respectively, for those without CMDs. The prevalence rates of mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia per 1000 person-years in the CMDs population were 0.064 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.08), 2.593 (95% CI: 2.50, 2.69) and 1.010 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.010), respectively (Table 3).

Table 2 Cardiometabolic disease status and risk of cognitive impairment and different subtypes of dementia in the population: hazard ratios with 95% CI.
Table 3 Cardiometabolic Disease Status and Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment and Various Dementia Subtypes in Populations: per 1000 person-year.

Effect of ambient air pollution on mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk in individuals with cardiometabolic diseases

When analyzed in combination with CMDs status and ambient air pollution factors, patients with non-CMDs and those with CMDs showed consistent associations with a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia if they maintained high levels of ambient air pollution exposure (Fig. 1). The risk of mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia is 2.562 times, 1.686 times, 1.267 times, and 2.006 times higher, respectively, in patients with CMDs and high exposure to ambient air pollution than in patients without CMDs and low exposure to ambient air pollution (Table 4). Among them, high levels of exposure to PM2.5, PM2.5−10, PM10, NO2, and NOX may elevate the risk of different dementia subtypes in patients with CMDs (Tables S7). The incidence rates of mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia per 1000 person-years in individuals with CMDs exposed to high levels of ambient air pollution were 0.087 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.12), 2.699 (95% CI: 2.54, 2.86), 1.050 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.15), and 0.743 (95% CI: 0.66, 0.83), respectively (Tables S8).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association between exposure to ambient air pollution and risk of developing mild cognitive impairment and several dementia subtypes in patients with cardiometabolic disease. Abbreviations: CMDs, Cardiometabolic disease; HR, hazard ratios; CI, Confidence Intervals;In the model, we controlled for basic sociodemographic factors [age, sex, race, educational level, occupational status, TDI, BMI] and health-related concerns [APOE genotype; history of hypertension; history of depression; dyslipidemia; hypertriglyceridemia; aspirin use; lipid-lowering medication use; serum 25(OH)D levels].

Table 4 Correlation between CMDs status and ambient air pollution combined variables and cognitive impairment and different subtypes of dementia.

In the stratified study using the presence of CMDs, high levels of ambient air pollution increased the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in the non-CMDs population by 12.0% and 25.3%, respectively [all-cause dementia: HR = 1.120, 95% CI:1.030,1.218; Alzheimer’s disease: HR = 1.253, 95% CI:1.123,1.398] (Table 5). Compared with the lowest quartile of PM2.5 exposure, the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in non-CMDs individuals exposed to the highest quartile of PM2.5 is 1.137 and 1.242 times higher, respectively (Tables S9). High ambient air pollution exposure increased the risk of developing vascular dementia in patients with CMDs by 1.086 times compared to low exposure (Table 5). In addition, ambient air pollution was not found to be associated with the risk of developing mild cognitive impairment (P > 0.05) (Table 5 and Tables S9).

Table 5 The influence of ambient air pollution on cognitive impairment and dementia risk of CMDs population and non-CMDs population, stratified by CMDs status.

Effect of healthy lifestyle score on mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk in individuals with cardiometabolic diseases

When analyzed in combination with CMDs status and healthy lifestyle score factors, if patients with non-CMDs and those with CMDs maintained high healthy lifestyle scores, their risk of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia is lower (Fig. 2). The risk of mild cognitive impairment and different dementia types decreased as healthy lifestyle scores increased in individuals with or without CMDs. Those with scores of 5 to 7 and no CMDs had the lowest risk for mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, and vascular dementia. The risk of developing mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia was 2.973-fold, 1.516-fold, 1.169-fold, and 1.940-fold higher, respectively, among those with CMDs and a healthy lifestyle score of 0 to 1 than among those without CMDs and a healthy lifestyle score of 5 to 7 (Table 6). The incidence rates per 1000 person-years for mild cognitive impairment, all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia in patients with CMDs in the Healthy Lifestyle Score 0–1 subgroup were 0.095 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.39), 2.951 (95% CI: 2.28, 3.82), 0.912 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.45), and 0.814 (95% CI: 0.49, 1.33), respectively (Table S10).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between healthy lifestyle score and risk of developing cognitive impairment and several dementia subtypes in patients with cardiometabolic disease. Abbreviations: CMDs, Cardiometabolic disease; HR, hazard ratios; CI, Confidence Intervals;In the model, we controlled for basic sociodemographic factors [age, sex, race, educational level, occupational status, TDI, BMI] and health-related concerns [APOE genotype; history of hypertension; history of depression; dyslipidemia; hypertriglyceridemia; aspirin use; lipid-lowering medication use; serum 25(OH)D levels].

Table 6 Correlation between CMDs status and healthy lifestyle combined variables and cognitive impairment and different subtypes of dementia.

In studies using CMDs presence or absence as a stratifying factor, a significant statistical association was discovered between a healthy lifestyle and the risk of incident all-cause dementia and vascular dementia in individuals with CMDs. The risk of developing all-cause dementia and vascular dementia was 1.314 and 1.354 times higher, respectively, in patients with CMDs scoring 0 to 1 on the Healthy Lifestyle Score than that in those with CMDs scoring 5 to 7 (Table 7). In addition, except for the healthy diet model, there were significant statistical associations between the remaining six healthy lifestyles and the risk of developing mild cognitive impairment or different subtypes of dementia. In terms of the magnitude of the effect of a healthy lifestyle on the risk of developing mild cognitive impairment and dementia, adopting a healthy lifestyle may have the greatest impact on reducing the risk of mild cognitive impairment (Table S11).

Effect modification of ambient air pollution on mild cognitive impairment and dementia risk by lifestyle score in individuals with cardiometabolic diseases

Table 7 The influence of healthy lifestyle score on cognitive impairment and dementia risk of CMDs population and non-CMDs population stratified by CMDs status.

In CMDs patients with high levels of exposure to ambient air pollution, the risk of all-cause dementia may also decrease as the healthy lifestyle subgroup score increases [0 to 1 score subgroup: HR = 3.049, 95% CI: 1.559, 5.965; 2 to 3 score subgroup: HR = 1.805, 95% CI: 1.534, 2.124; 4 score subgroup: HR = 1.525, 95% CI: 1.286, 1.808; 5 to 7 score subgroup: HR = 1.623, 95% CI: 1.383, 1.906] (Table 8). Similar results were noted for the environmental contaminants PM2.5, and NOX (Table S12). CMDs patients exposed to moderate air pollution have the highest risk of vascular dementia in the subgroups with healthy lifestyle scores of 2–3, 4, and 5–7. Ambient air pollutants had a more statistically significant adverse effect on the risk of vascular dementia in patients with CMDs than in the non-CMDs population. In addition, in the healthy lifestyle score 0 to 1 subgroup, no associations were found between patients with CMDs exposed to high levels of ambient air pollution and the risk of developing mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia (Table 8).

Table 8 Effect modification of CMDs status and ambient air pollution combined variables on cognitive impairment and dementia risk by healthy lifestyle in individuals.

When analyzing the modulatory effect of a healthy lifestyle on the impact of ambient air pollution on mild cognitive impairment and different subtypes of dementia risk in the population without CMDs and CMDs, it was found that exposure to ambient air pollution may have had a greater effect on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in non-CMDs patients in the 5 to 7 point subgroup compared to the 2 to 3 point subgroup of healthy lifestyle scores [2 to 3 score subgroup: HR = 1.267, 95% CI: 1.025, 1.566; 5 to 7 score subgroup: HR = 1.328, 95% CI: 1.123, 1.572] (Table 9). In addition, in the healthy lifestyle score 0 to 1 subgroup, a significant statistical association was found between PM2.5 and NOX exposure and the risk of all-cause dementia in CMDs patients. In the healthy lifestyle score 2 to 3 subgroup, a significant statistical association was found between PM10 exposure and the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in CMDs patients (Table S13).

Table 9 Effect modification of ambient air pollution on cognitive impairment and dementia risk by healthy lifestyle in individuals when CMDs status is used as a stratification factor.

At the same time, an interaction was found in this study between the scores for a healthy lifestyle and the exposure to ambient air pollution. Using low-level exposure to ambient air pollution and a healthy lifestyle score of 5 to 7 as the control group, we found that exposure to medium-level ambient air pollution and a healthy lifestyle score of 0 to 1 in non-CMDs population may have the greatest risk of mild cognitive impairment and all-cause dementia. In contrast, exposure to high levels of ambient air pollution and a healthy lifestyle score of 0 to 1 in the CMDs population may have the greatest risk of all-cause dementia and vascular dementia. These included a possible reduction in the risk of all-cause dementia and vascular dementia in patients with CMDs with increasing healthy lifestyle scores at constant levels of exposure to ambient air pollution (Table 10). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results, further ensuring the reliability of the study (Table S14 to S25).

Table 10 Effects of ambient air pollution and healthy lifestyle score interactions on the risk of developing cognitive impairment and different dementia subtypes in patients with CMDs.

Source link

Visited 1 times, 1 visit(s) today

Related Article

Keep heartbreak purely emotional with healthy lifestyle choices

Retirement, fitness and walking with dog and couple in neighborhood park for relax, health and sports workout. Love, wellness and pet with old man and senior woman in outdoor morning walk together While we’re busy celebrating Valentine’s weekend with our significant other, family or friends, let’s not forget to show our own hearts some love

「Six Seven !」

「Six Seven !」(6-7)我必須承認,初次被年輕人們問我知否這詞彙時,還以為是新一代的粗口代名詞。 原來非也,「Six Seven」是二○二五年度詞彙,現時在TikTok和Gen Alpha(Alpha世代,二○一○年後出生)間爆紅用語。它於我像一串敲打着世代之門的密碼,身為研究傳播學的人,我竟在這些碎片裏迷了路。 我像個舉着放大鏡在兒童塗鴉前苦思的考古學家,忍不住追問:「不是粗口的話,到底代表甚麼?表達甚麼意思?」眾年輕人靜默後爆出哄笑。短髮女孩答:「它甚麼都不是啊!」他們展示影片中的人,可在成功、失敗或看到迷因時大喊「Six Seven」,原來,這詞並無具體定義,是萬用感歎詞,表達荒謬、無聊、搞笑或純粹圈內共鳴。重點就是年輕人覺得「毋須解釋或解讀,在於大家都明(懂就懂)」的氛圍——語氣沒嘲諷沒啥非表達不可之意,說的人和聽的人,只有某種共享荒謬的親密感。我愣住,忽然想起傳播理論課上自己曾斬釘截鐵地說:「所有流行語必然承載社會意涵。」此刻,這句話像回力鏢般擊中眉心。 另一男孩補充:「就像我們突然說『香蕉會飛呀!』一樣,沒啥意思,亦沒啥想表達,純粹夠無聊!懂就懂,不懂亦毋須解釋,讓他們不懂就好!」我忽然懂了。這代人在資訊海嘯中長大,意義被過度生產、過度解讀。於是「Six Seven」成了他們的避難所——一個刻意空洞的符號,拒絕被定義、拒絕承載重量。它唯一的功能,就是標記「此時此地,我們一起胡言亂語」的瞬間。這或許是年輕世代的一種身份認同,特點是故意讓家長、老師、大人聽不懂,以此建立「屬於我們的內梗(inside joke)」。 或許,每個世代都需要點「毫無意義」的語言符號,去逃脫意義的牢籠。Alpha世代,顛覆了我的世代,「Six Seven」令我發現:雖然一把年紀,世界還有太多現象我不懂。 Source link

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x